and everyone else says that gravity is limited to velocity c. Thus if the

Sun were to disappear this instant we would not know it for eight and

one-third minutes, gravitationally speaking, as well as photonically

speaking. This leads to some rather interesting anomalies, such as, if this

is so then gravity must be electromagnetic, since the vacuum defines the

velocity c, and the vacuum velocity is electromagnetic in origin. This seems

to elude all physicists. "

I agree with the first sentence, but Einstein and everyone else are wrong about the speed of gravity and I think I can prove this statement through philosophy, logic, and experimental evidence. First of all, philosophically, gravity must represent the coordinate system of nature. Gravity is how nature keeps track of all things, a thing being a mass. The mass provides a place for connections (the things) and gravity provides the connections. Therefore, the coordinate system must be in place before any event can occur within the coordinate system and the system must be able to establish itself at a "speed" which is faster than the fastest thing to move within the system. As experimental evidence, paired elementary particles, when separated in space, "know" the condition of the other at a speed that is greater than the speed of light. Both of these particles have mass and thus must have gravity. My model simply has them connected with a self gravion which is the method they use to "communicate" at a speed which is faster than light. This is proven experimental evidence and my model is the only one that explains this property (as well as all the other things it explains). I will always give Einstein (or any one else) credit when I think they are right, but I will also say when I think they are wrong. If Einstein were alive today, I think he would be the first to listen to me because he was concerned more with finding the truth, rather than just being right.

If you don't think that gravity has to "know" about and be a part of every reaction in the real world, then name me any event that occurs outside of gravity's "knowledge." As an example, let us take a race car and analyze the situation from the viewpoint of gravity. You see, even though I know most of the "rules" that mankind has made concerning science, I don't look at things from that viewpoint. I look at things from natures viewpoint to find what things she must do. What problems does she have? The first problem that I can think of is that she has to keep track of everything and how all these things relate to each other. Gravity is the way she does this.. So back to the race car. A guy (or gal) gets in a race car. Under the gravionic model, human thought is collections of connections of gravity, so the driver uses gravity to become aware and decide to go fast and push the accelerator to the floor. Next, the left-over dead bodies of ancient creatures who originally got their energy from the sun, are mixed with oxygen and burned in a chemical reaction to make more gravity in the motor and drive train and in the motion of the car. Meanwhile, the driver is "feeling" all this gravity that is made and abated as the car traverses the track, all the time measuring the friction between the tires and the road. Even the paint on the side of the car (which is another chemical reaction) adds to the total weight of gravity present in the vehicle. I could go on for days, but the point is that all energies, including the human energy which runs the car are contained in gravitational structures built around points of mass.

Thus I disagree that our planet would need 8 minutes to find out that the sun just blew. My model indicates that a shift in gravitational connections would occur at the speed of C^2, although the energy in those systems would not reach us for those minutes. We could set up an experiment and measure this system, but I would only have those 8 minutes to "gloat" before that energy did get here and propel us into the next star system.

Gravity is not electromagnetic. Gravity defines space. Gravity would represent the "ether" or the place where things can happen. All things that we have come to know as space, are the accumulated connections of gravity. All radiation must pass through this system and is guided by this system. The vacuum doesn't define the velocity c. Gravity defines space at the speed of c^2 and then energies move through this system at the velocity of c. The proof of this lies in the fact that light is bent by gravity. Light must have this gravitational component to "know" of the gravity of bodies it bends around. I say that gravions perform this function and there is experimental evidence that shows it does this faster than the speed of light. The only choice for a speed is c^2.

If any one doesn't understand what I am saying or my arguments, please tell me and I will try to explain things in a different manner. It is so much harder to write this than if I could explain it to you in person

Your friend,