I know that when I last saw you, I was not able to fully explain my contention that gravity must be included in Einstein’s most famous equation, E=mc². At the point in time of my visit, the gravionic model was still only a gleam in my eye, and was at the point the idea was first being fathered. Since that time, the model has been developing within me and now I am ready to give birth to this new model which answers so many of mankind’s questions regarding nature and how it works. I can tell all those women out there that I now know from experience that birthing something is a lot more work than just the fathering part. Anyway, as part of this process, I would like to submit my arguments to you as to why gravity must be included in the equation and the equation is more natural in the form E=gmc².

My first contention is that mass represents identity in the cosmos and gravity represents the relationship between masses. Therefore, gravity must know about every event, reaction, process, or real thing in the cosmos. My first set of arguments will center on proving that gravity does indeed know about every process in the real world. To prove this idea, I would like to use one of my favorite examples of gravity and that is a racecar. I would like to very carefully examine the forces involved in a racecar and see if gravity has a hand in every reaction and event of the race. If you can not offer me an example of an event that gravity does not know about, then you must accept my argument that gravity does know about each and every event that is real in our cosmos.

Now to set up our imaginary racecar, we must imagine some super accurate scales that exist on the racetrack that can give us an instantaneous measurement of the weight being applied to each wheel of the car, whether it is standing still or moving. So now that we have access to this super sensitive scale, we can measure the force of gravity at each of the four corners and thus calculate the total for the vehicle. To start our experiment, we would first weigh our vehicle completely empty and without a driver. This would be our base weight. Remember that since the Earth’s gravity varies from one location to another, we would have different "tares" at each of the four weigh stations, but as long as we keep them in a constant location, our experiment would still be valid. So we first weigh our racecar and get a starting weight. Now we will begin doing things to our car and see if gravity "knows" about each and every event.

The first thing I would like to do is paint the car. Painting is a chemical reaction. Will gravity "know" that the paint has been added? Well, yes. Gravity does know about paint. Take the space shuttle as an example. The only shuttle to ever have a painted external fuel tank was the first. All the others were not painted to save weight so that less fuel would have to be burned and more payloads could be carried. Gravity definitely knows about paint and I would content, all chemical reactions must be a part of the gravitational system and every chemical bond must have a gravitational component. Gravity would definitely "know" that the racecar had paint on it.

And what would you say about dust? If there were small particles of dust sticking to the side of the car by static electricity, would gravity know about these particles? Yes it would. The dust sticking to the car would show up on our scales, so gravity must "know" about electrical events.

Next let’s stick a magnet to the side of the car. Would that magnet register at each of the four wheels where our super accurate gravity meters are straining to catch every change in the gravity of our vehicle? Of course it would. Gravity "knows" about all events of magnetism. Magnetism is an aspect of gravity and gravity’s job must surely encompass keeping tract of all events of magnetism.

To reinforce the fact that gravity must know about events of electricity and magnetism, look at the engine of the car. When the electrical system of the car ignites the fuel within the engine, gravity is created within all of the moving parts of the engine. The pistons have more and less gravity as they travel up and down the cylinders, the crankshaft gathers gravity as it spins, and all parts of the drive train weigh more because they are turning than if they were sitting still. (By the way, Einstein said that we couldn’t tell the difference between gravity created by spinning something and gravity created by a large body, like a planet.) The car itself weighs more when it is moving. If we put our scales on a high bank of the racetrack and weigh the car as it goes by, we see that gravity has increased because of the actions of burning the fuel and creating gravity within the car and its components.

What happens to the car when a driver is added? Does gravity "know" that a living being is in the car? Yes. Now the human being can think to himself, "I want this car to start moving" and can then put into action a series of processes that cause the car to move and to create more gravity. So gravity "knows" the weight of the living being and it too must be measured at every instance to keep track of all things of mass. But more importantly, the human beings thought must also be a part of the gravitational system, because the system reacts to a human thought. Human thought must also be a part of the gravitational system.

The entire process of driving a racecar represents the process of understanding gravity and controlling it. The process of driving the racecar is one of taking carbon parts from ancient species and mixing their innards with oxygen and capturing the resulting energy to turn mechanical parts. Gravity must know about all of these events and must be measuring them at incredible speeds. All good drivers drive by the "seat of their pants." What does this mean? It means that the driver is actually feeling the connections of gravity that exist between his mind and his body and the car he is driving. He can "feel" when a tire is about to break lose and loose its traction, because every event in his mind, every event in the car, and every event in the race must involve the connections of gravity and must be a part of the overall gravitational system. A good driver is good because he has a better feel of his car and the race tract and that feel must be a part of the system of gravitational connections as described in the gravionic model.

Next let’s examine electromagnetic energy. According to Einstein, if we let light shine on the car, some of it would be converted to mass and the car would therefore have more mass. But if it has more mass, doesn’t it have to have more gravity? Wouldn’t the car weigh more, if our scales were accurate enough to catch it? Yes, gravity would know about any changes in mass to our vehicle. As a further example, take a photoelectric cell. Would a cell that is exposed to light and is making electricity weigh more than one that is in the dark and not making electricity? If you believe in Einstein’s energy to mass equation, then you must answer yes and again I have shown that every event, every reaction, every process, and in fact, every real thing must have gravity as a component of the reaction or event. It can’t be real otherwise. The connections of gravity define those events that are real.

The next major point I would like to make is to ask the question "When does gravity know about these events?" If you ask physicist about the speed of gravity, they will tell you that it must be the speed of light. As an example from my own field of electronics, let’s take a radio wave. Pretend we are just turning on a radio transmitter that is about to broadcast a radio wave. How fast does gravity work? According to modern electronics, a gravity wave travels out in front of the electromagnetic wave at the speed of light. I say this can not be true. The gravionic model predicts that the connections of gravity are established at the speed of gravity (c²) and that each connection is distinct and different. Each radio wave must exist between a specific mass at each end and the connection of gravity (or the definition of that space) must occur at the speed of gravity which is must faster than the speed of light.

Must gravity propagate at a speed that is faster than the speed of light? Yes it must. If gravity is the coordinate system of nature, then it must establish itself at a speed that is faster than anything which moves within the system. The assumption that mankind has been erroneously making is that nature is Euclidean, that space is made of straight lines. The reality of nature is that it doesn’t have some universal Euclidean coordinate system by which it can measure everything. The gravionic model shows that each particle and each group of particles must define the rest of the cosmos in relation to itself. At least, it must define that part of the cosmos that it has gravionic connections in relation to itself.

Since gravity must define all other systems in relationship to itself, gravity must define these events by extending gravions out from itself. If these gravions could only expand at the rate of light, then no system moving at near the speed of light could ever be aware of any event outside of itself. The reason is because an object moving at the speed of light must be able to define space at a speed that is greater than the speed it is moving. It must define this relationship in three dimensions and could never know about an object that is moving in a direction other than the direction of movement of the object itself. Thus there must be a "speed" to the cosmos that is greater than the speed of light.

Has a speed ever been detected that is greater than the speed of light? Yes. Several experiments have now confirmed that photons separated by miles have the ability to know about happenings to each other at a speed that is quicker than the speed of light. What speed could this be? It must be the speed of gravity at c².

If you look at current cosmology, they assume that gravity has an infinite speed, else how could gravity possibly measure everything at the same time to even attempt to see if "the universe" is going to collapse or expand. The entire theory means nothing unless you assume that gravity has an infinite speed. But the gravionic model shows that an infinite speed would be out side of time and a speed the speed of light would not work.

And as a final proof that energy and gravity are parts of the equation, look at the racecar from an overview. As a philosopher, I look down on the racecar and its driver and here is what I see. First of all, the connections of gravity within a human mind had to imagine and then build this car. The only thing that caused this car to come into existence is the thoughts and dreams of human beings using their minds.

Look at the fuel for the car. It is made of hydrocarbons, which are the remains of ancient creatures that once lived on the Earth. Although we now know that some forms of life get their energy from chemical sources and not from the sun, most of the energy for life on our planet comes from the sun. The hydrocarbon molecules of the fuel originally got the energy we are exploiting when life converted electromagnetic radiation into chemical bonds within the living being. When the being died, that energy remained stored in these bonds and was compacted and preserved by the gravitational pressures exerted on the material by the planet Earth. Man then recovered these materials and refined and purified them to fit his needs. In the racecar, these materials are combined with oxygen and burned with a chemical fire to extract the energy from the bond. And what is the end result of this process? The end result is the creation of gravity in the mechanical parts of the automobile. Energy is added and mass and gravity increase. I have proved that energy and gravity are one and Einstein proved that energy and mass are one, so I think that you should accept my contention that E=gmc² must be correct. Gravity must be involved in every physical event or reaction and you can not name an event that gravity does not have a role. That role must always involve keeping tract of all things "mass" and accomplishes this role by continually making and breaking connections of gravity (gravions) which connect and propagate at the speed of gravity (c²).

More light can be shed on gravity by looking at Newton’s universal law of gravity. In it he says that "each and every particle of the universe has a force of attraction (gravity) that is proportional to the size of the bodies and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the bodies." What are the assumptions here? The first assumption is that gravity can be infinite in speed. How else could every particle of the universe have an effect on every other particle unless gravity was able to solve this problem instantaneously without regard to time? Every particle doesn’t have this effect on every other particle. Only those particles with connections of gravity (gravions) have this effect on each other. Think of an asteroid flying through the solar system. Does it have an effect on the Earth when the sun comes between the two? Probably it doesn’t. Does it have an effect on the Earth when it is outside the orbit of Pluto? Probably it doesn’t. Is there a moment when it first comes close enough to Earth that the two bodies do begin having an effect on one another. Certainly there is that moment, the moment the first two connections of gravity occur between the two bodies. Is gravity discrete? Yes it is. So the first assumption contained within Newton’s universal law of gravity is incorrect. Notice it is the same assumptions that cosmologists have used in forming the single big bang model. For the model to have any validity, gravity must be infinite in speed, else every particle in "the universe" could not possibly "know" about every other particle, since many would be too far apart to have connections of gravity.

If you can name an event, reaction, process, or real thing in the cosmos that does not involve gravity, then please let me know.

Your friend,