6/29/4 Dome On Mars
http://www.rense.com/general54/dome.htm
If it's natural, I think it's ice.Blueberries
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/
151/1M141588292EFF3200P2907M2M1.JPG
I'm still amazed at the "blueberries" that NASA has found. Notice
how they seem to be the last thing happening. This one seems to be
pushing it's way out of the dirt. These things are always on top,
but yet they have little dust on them, like they were new. There
appears to be a piece of one in the next photo:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/
152/1M141691232EFF3200P2907M2M1.HTML
6/28/4 Mars Express MARSIS Antenna Deployment On Indefinite Hold
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/marsexpress-04p.html
6/27/4 Press Release Images: Spirit
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040625a.html
Press Release Images: Opportunity
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040625a.html
6/26/4 NASA Mars Rover Surprises Continue - Spirit, Too,
Finds Hematite
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14470
What Makes
Lyme Disease Tick?
http://www.rense.com/general54/whatmakeslyme.htm
I've posted this since many Morgellons patients have Lyme Disease.
6/25/4 Leaving Home
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-terraform-04g.html
Does anyone know how to contact Arthur C. Clarke?
It Was Our Day
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/xprize-04l.html
Amen. This is a letter I recently wrote about the same subject:
Dear Thom,
I have a different view of Ayn Rand and, in
particular, The Fountainhead, than you have expressed. When I read The
Fountainhead, it changed my life, because, in some ways, I saw myself in
Howard Roark. You knew the history of Ayn Rand and have put that
interpretation into your viewpoint. I read it as an unaware youngster
and the only message I received is the war between the genius and both
government and business. I saw both us acting against genius to keep
genius down.
A perfect example has now emerged. Burt
Rutan has shown up NASA, Russia, and the rest of the developed
scientific world with his unique designs and implementations for getting
human beings into space. The problem I see is now everyone is
exclaiming what private enterprise can do. But I would contend it isn't
private enterprise, as that only provides the vehicle, but the genius of
a single individual that is the process at work. The business provides
him the resources, but the results come from the genius of a single
individual, rather than the private enterprise system itself. After
all, if we gave $20 million to Boeing or any other of the established
aerospace companies, they could not repeat the results obtained by Burt
Rutan and his small company.
Thus the message in The Fountainhead to me
was about the struggle between those with genius and the ability to
change all of human progress and the rest of society including
government and business that always have other interests in mind. I'll
never forget this quote from the book. "Man's ego is the fountainhead
of human progress." Whether Burt Rutan realizes he is a genius or not,
he has an ego that makes him think that he can do things a better way.
And he can and did. Human progress will make another leap forward from
his genius and his work. He is a Howard Roark of our times.
I don't know if this is interesting to you,
but it's another viewpoint.
Your friend,
micromike
6/24/4 Testing of the Frass Meteorite (update)
There is much wisdom in the response below. I am a philosopher
and a pure scientists in that I don't understand politics. It seems
to me that it is hard enough to figure out nature if one searches only for
the truth. Those that would put there own benefits above those of
society are hurting humanity by confusing many the issues of science with
opinions and dogma. I have never wanted to do the testing of the
Frass, since there are so many people more capable of the various
tests needed than I. All I want is to be able to take the test
results and try to find the overviews required of a good philosopher.
Greetings Mr. Moore;
Mr. Moore you say in this last email; "My only concern is that you
have
been misled by the meteoritic community to think that a meteorite must
meet their definition of a meteorite, when my claim all along is that
the Frass is a newly formed meteorite from a planetary body; i.e. the
lava of Mars".
Mr. Moore there is nothing further from the truth with regards to this
statement. The scientific community has not misled me. They tried to
mislead me and others at first but the methods used were shallow and
lacking in substance. I base my sample findings on a combination of
research, lab work, and observational evidence. But there are certain
ground rules that must be observed having to do with the overlapping of
logic and chemistry. The main problem they have in misleading others is
that they have to violate these ground rules in order perpetuate a
fraud. I have nothing to gain from behaving in a similar fashion and no
incentive because I gain or lose nothing from examining your sample.
If it turns out to be a meteorite and you win, you will not gain much
because your own acceptance is tied to an intent on convincing "the
scientific community". Even if it is a meteorite from Mars or some other
place you will never convince them.......period, and you should not be
trying to do that. I can say that the trend is shifting as more people
do their own work outside of government funding because these scientists
you are depending on are historically ignorant of the rule of law.
Prosecute a few of them as the USDOJ is getting ready to do and it will
change. (More on this later). The reason for this is that prosecuting
one is tantamount to pulling a brick out of a weak section of the wall
and the whole structure will crumble. There is no amount of scientific
evidence that will entice them to work with you.
If it turns out not to be a meteorite you still win because you gained
a much richer knowledge about yourself and humanity and the
socio-political psyche. I know you feel you have been treated very badly
but if you have been given the amount of time and effort we think you
have then you have very little to complain about. On the other hand if
the JSC scientist(s)told you your sample was a piece of granite then you
have to be suspicious and look into it. You have learned from our web
site that scientists can be ruthless just like any blue collar criminal.
Don't be fooled by the word academic, or phrase academic environment.
The proof is in the pudding. These polite terms do not apply when you
have discovered lying, cheating, and stealing.
Finally, if you are incorrect you must be prepared to apologize and
extend an olive branch. If our findings show they are incorrect or
engaged in fraud, then they must revise their position or there legal
remedies in place that can be invoked in order to hold them accountable
for their misdeeds.
SRD
www.bccmeteorites.com
6/23/4 Testing of the Frass Meteorite
I have been having discussions with S. Ray DeRusse of Boggy Creek
Meteorites about some additional testing of the Frass Meteorite.
Although we still may have some disagreements about different issues, I
want to get any tests done that I can. So I will be sending a sample
to him in the next few days. Here is a portion of our conversation:
Dear Ray,
I'm always willing to let the chips fall where they may. However, I'm not
willing to accept any tired old models of cosmology or astronomy or
geology
that say that things are only a single way and no other interpretation is
possible. The problem with the Frass from the beginning is that current
meteoritic community is not set up for discovering newly formed meteorites
from planetary bodies. There is no doubt the Frass is a meteorite, since
it
appeared within a 24 hour period, is totally unlike any other material
within hundreds of miles, is melted over its entire outer surface and has
clearly made a trip through the atmosphere, contains magnetic basaltic
dust,
has not been wet in somewhere between 13 and 50 million years, clearly
shows to have been on the surface (never compressed) in 50 million years,
shows the dead bodies (not fossilized) of insects and plants that are more
than 13 million years old, and to top it off, contains a life form now
seen on Mars in literally hundreds of microscopic pictures, just as I
predicted.
The problem I have faced is that people bring their own small world view
and
shine it on the Frass. They can only see it within the possibilities of
their world. Even though many surface rocks on Mars look exactly like the
Frass, these people can not conceive that one of those rocks could come to
Earth and that I could have it in my hands. Every single scientists that
has rejected the Frass as a meteorite from Mars has used a different
excuse.
They will never meet me at the same time and allow me to challenge their
assumptions. The last group rejected the Frass because it didn't show any
"shocking" from being ejected from Mars. I showed them a paper that
proposed a new mechanism for ejecting material from Mars without shocking
and another paper that showed that the "known" Martian meteorites show
little or no shocking, at least from their exit from Mars. These people
swore the meteorite was a volcanic bomb, since it is clearly melted over
the
entire exterior. Then I showed them the two ages of creation and
explained
that a volcanic bomb is created in a single step and is not likely to have
little insect and plant parts inside it. Besides, I found one of the
rocks
I test inside the other rock, so I know there must be at least two
creation
dates since it also has sand inside of it that must be older still. They
just shrug and say in their opinion, it is a volcanic bomb, because that
is
how they look.
I will not role over and accept any more "bad" science. Whatever tests
you
propose, are not specific for Martian origin, thus I don't see how they
could be conclusive for anything. But I do suspect if you compare them to
what we are seeing on Mars, you will find a correlation, because all of
the
other evidence points that way. Richard Hoagland thinks that the known
Mars meteorites actually came from a planet that exploded and that Mars
was the moon of that planet. I have no way of knowing if any of that is
true, but I do know that in an infinite cosmos, all things are possible
and that the
Frass represents something wonderful that has fallen from the heavens.
My goal from the beginning has been to get more tests done. Every single
test that has been conducted on the Frass has been done by me using
professional labs. No other person has performed a single test.
What I've wanted most was to get elemental oxides from the thin sections.
They contain a variety of material and all should be tested. Logic
dictates
that any piece that is clearly Martian brings the whole rock with it.
So I'm all for more tests. I just don't want old and tired models applied
to something that clearly falls outside the norm, as far as meteorites go.
Your friend,
micromike
Well Mr. Moore Greetings;
I cannot conceive of you having someone with a more open mind than me.
I really have no motive or bad intentions on your sample or in looking
at your sample. I just want you to know that there is someone you can
trust. Let me give you an example. When Steve Shoner sent me (and by
the way I have more data on his sample than I have posted on the
Internet), an end slice of Takysie Lake, I was baffled. Here is someone
who is very tied to the community in AZ and and cannot even get them to
retest it. He informed me he was very frustrated with them and had been
trying I believe for ten years or more to have them look at it again. He
tells me this is the only sample ever labeled "pseudo meteorite". He
also said to me "Mr. Ninninger to his dying day, Ray, insisted and told
me Takysie Lake was a lunar meteorite".
It dawned on me that if BCC9601 was lunar and Takysie Lake was too
(genetically from the same source) there should be similarities
expressed in the diffraction patterns as a function of bulk composition
from a powdered sample only. The similarities and differences between
the two would be enhanced by using the powdered method. I was in shock
when we superimposed both patterns on the same page! I mean after all,
this had never been done before; the success rate of identifying a
canadian stone related to one from Texas and both from the Moon would be
so astronomically low. But we did it.
As I see it the first step in identifying your sample is to first see
if it is a meteorite rather than a sample from Mars. Because think about
it, wouldn't it be equally important if it is a meteorite? It doesn't
have to be from Mars, does it? If you have thin sections send them to me
by registered or certified mail, along with some clear and sharp
photographs and I will examine them. As I mentioned, it is not necessary
to send any of the sample provided the thin sections comprise a fairly
representative batch of the main mass. I also need the mass density and
dimensions of your sample as well as a short description of its shape.
You may post this on your web site if you wish.
Sincerely,
S. Ray DeRusse
www.bccmeteorites.com
Dear Ray,
I do trust you and I thank you for letting me post your letter. My only
concern is that you have been misled by the meteoritic community to think
that a meteorite must meet their definition of a meteorite, when my claim
all along is that the Frass is a newly formed meteorite from a planetary
body; i.e. the lava of Mars. If would therefore have much more in common
with Earth lava than it would with a "typical" meteorite made from the
dead
bodies of planets and suns that have gone before.
Here is an paper by Allan Treiman that says something similar: Lindstrom
M.M., Treiman A.H. and Mittlefehldt D. (1994) Pigeonholing planetary
meteorites: The lessons of misclassification of EET87521 and ALH84001.
Lunar
Planet Sci. XXV, 797-798.
Typical meteorites have generally endured million, if not billions of
years
in space. They were created long ago and have been "sitting" around
absorbing radiation for a long time. The Frass (by scientific tests) is
known to be a recent addition to the solar system, having been created
mostly only 13 million years ago. This just means that comparing the
Frass
to a typical meteorite will probably be rather useless. What will be
useful, is comparing it to Mars material now being tested on Mars.
The problem is the reverse in logic. If the rock comes from Mars, then it
is a meteorite no matter what the current definition, unless the Aliens
brought it here. :-) The logic in the meteoritic community has been thus:
All cats I've seen have black tails, therefore all cats have black tails.
Now if you have studied logic, then you know this logic to be false.
Defining all meteorites in terms of those already identified, and then
only
finding those that meet the definition is a circular process that never
leads to the finding of "new" or different meteorites. The fact that the
Frass landed on my great aunt's ranch in a known period and that it
clearly
shows it's transit through the atmosphere already define it as a
meteorite.
No meteorite specialist need put his approval on the rock. The task that
is
before us is to accept it as a new class of meteorite and see if it's
planet
of origin isn't Mars, since the evidence already points so strongly in
that
direction. Remember a second meteorite has now surfaced that has the
exact same characteristics as the Frass, yet came from thousands of miles
away, landing in a farmer's field.
But, I want any tests done that I can get done and I don't care if we have
different interpretations of the tests. I will always be glad to post any
and all of your comments as my goal is to find the truth and philosophers
love differences of opinions, because that is how we really learn, if we
are
honest with ourselves. So I will get the thin sections and photos to you
as
soon as possible and we'll see what the results might be.
Your friend,
micromike
6/22/4 Planetary Uncertainty Principle
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-life-04k.html
Her is the most honest answer I've ever seen from NASA:
Kim Stanley Robinson (KSR):
Now tell me, what's your field of expertise? What do you study?
John Rummel (JR): I don't have any expertise - I work at NASA
Headquarters.
Should We Terraform? Great Terraforming
Debate: Part III
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-terraform-04c.html
6/21/4 Private craft flies into space
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/06/21/suborbital.test/index.html
From what I've just heard on CNN, Burt Rutan is dedicated to going to the
moon and Mars with his inventions. Why don't we just give him NASA's
budget and we'd be to Mars shortly. This may be the most important
post I've made to the life of Mars. Although I've recently
sent in a new sample from the Frass and the Frass2 meteorite to a member
of the Mars exploration team, I've almost lost faith in NASA and it's
associated agencies to ever tell us the truth about the life of Mars.
If Burt can get us there, we'd know the truth.
6/20/4 Large Glassy found by Spirit? (update)
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/158/
2M140401551EFF6800P2977M2M1.JPG
Dear Mike,
Indeed, this a good observation. At least there are two pieces on each
side of the gap, possibly belong to same object. From my experience, it
is very difficult to find these types does bridging. They often broken
apart, because they are not elastic and they appears fixed to the soil.
Best see if they are bridging in this case to look into the gap only by
is covering visible parts on each side by fingers
My web space is
http://gravity.webhostme.com/mars/
Great site. Check it out. Also check out this new picture from
Spirit. Look for the glassies.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/
opportunity/20040617a/Tennessee_RAT_Hole_MI_mosaic-B141R1.jpg
Here
is another photo from Opportunity. Look in the lower right corner of
the picture:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/
1/m/142/1M140791471EFF3190P2957M2M1.JPG Now compare with the
following from the Frass:
http://www.marslife.com/newbug.htm
Microscopic Imager :: Sol 142
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity_m142.html
Almost every picture in this section shows something unsual.
6/19/4 Giving Mars Back its Heartbeat. Great Terraforming
Debate: Part I
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-terraform-04a.html
Outer
Space Not So Lifeless After All
http://www.rense.com/general53/s2dwed.htm
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - Scoop Mark And Scar
http://www.rense.com/general53/pohil.htm
6/18/4 MARS: THE LIFE DISCLOSED
I posted this link yesterday and I've gotten myself in trouble. I've hurt someone's
feelings and that is never my intent. I think all of us very much
appreciate the professional translation that has been provided and we
thank the person responsible for the work. I would advise all of you who read this
site, that I am usually smiling when I write my comments. I take
very seriously the life of Mars, but I try not to take myself too
seriously, since I'm only a speck in an infinite cosmos. That is why
I keep the name micromike; to remind me to be small and humble.
I'm very sorry for my post but thankful for work that provides more
clues as to the life of Mars..
Dear micromike,
the first translation
http://www.margheritacampaniolo.it/Feltri/Mars_the_life_disclosed.htm
Site address:
http://www.margheritacampaniolo.it/Feltri/Home_Feltri.htm
All the best
Thank you for the work you are doing and the wonderful translation to
English..
The Red Planet – Dead Or Alive?
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-life-04j.html
Alive!
6/17/4 Giant Cousins of 'Mars Blueberries' in Utah
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/utah_blueberries_040616.html
6/16/4 Large Glassy found by Spirit?
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/158/
2M140401551EFF6800P2977M2M1.JPG
On the right side of this picture, there appears to be a "stick" or a
large glassy that bridges the gap across the crevice in this rock.
When NASA uses the microscopic imager, they generally take a series of
photos at the same spot. Each is focused at slightly different
depths to get different features in focus, as the depth of field on the
imaginer is not great. All the other photos in this series show this
object, but this photo is the most in focus for this object. Here is
another from another day:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/
160/2M140565777EFF6900P2906M2M1.JPG
Opportunity Microscopic Imager
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity_m125.html
Here are the latest pictures from Opportunity. One can't look at
them without seeing the unmistakable signs of life. Geology alone
could not have created this diversity.
Press Release Images: Spirit
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040615a.html
Here are some good "false" color photographs from Spirit. The
grey/black/blue rocks in these pictures looks very much like some of the
fragments from the Frass2 shown at right. Click picture for larger
view.
NASA's Mars Rovers Going the Extra Mile
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14402
If they photograph (and show us) any rocks with large amounts of vesicles,
then at some point, I would expect to see a
clump of
glassies, much like I've seen in the Frass and much like what has been
reported by Morgellons patients. Of course, it would probably be
surrounding some insect body, so they couldn't show us that.
6/15/4 A Glacial Quest For Alien Life Forms
http://www.rense.com/general53/alien.htm
6/14/4 An Open Letter to Jeff Rense
rense
Parasites - A Sufferer's Diary (update)
http://www.safe2use.com/pests/scabies/gettingridof/030.htm
“Regarding
the samples: contained approximately 15 structures. At the macroscopic
level, each appeared to be small masses of lint or natural fibers
approximately 0.5 to 1 mm in diameter. At the microscopic level (examined
at 100x and 450x), the structures appear as tightly woven, but irregularly
shaped stands of natural fibers. Each mass consists of a heterogeneous
assemblage of fibers – the vast majority of fibers lack color and are
somewhat consistent with Figure 6 provided by Dr. Amin's
Parasitetesting.com web site:
http://www.myplanet.net/yeec60bp/figure6.jpg
Approximately 20-30% of the fibers were tinted blue, approximately 5% were
tinted red, and less than 5% were
tinted green. Each structure varied in its specific assemblage of colored
fibers. Some lacked colored
fibers altogether or contained only one a single tinted fiber, which was
usually blue or red. Occasional wool
fibers were also seen and these appeared as dark brown. In my opinion,
most if not all of the fibers are
natural - likely cotton or paper and some wool.
While I don't agree with a lot of the conclusions of this article,
this paragraph caused me to wake up in the middle of the night. The
description of the colors and the ratios of colored fibers to white or
clear fibers is strikingly similar to what I've seen in the Frass and now
the Frass2. I've often wondered what this meant. Are they
different species? Are they different sexes? Are they
different ages? Is their color related to what materials they are
processing? I don't know.
Spirit Mars Rover Reaches
Hills, Opportunity Goes Deep
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/rovers_update_040613.html
6/13/4 Opportunity's Edgy Move on Mars
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/opportunity_rim_040611.html
Spirit Clocks Up Three Kilometers
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzz.html
6/12/4 Parasites - A Sufferer's Diary
http://www.safe2use.com/pests/scabies/gettingridof/030.htm
This is the link to the letter below. Very interesting.
6/11/4 A Question of Morgellons
Hello Mike,
My name is XXXX I
have been having the Morgellons symptoms for about 18 months. There is
another lady at my work that is going through a similar symptoms. There
is a difference in her lessons are much bigger and that she has
swellings. I am attaching an article that seems to fit her cases more
than mine. The one question I have is "Is the Morgellons Disease
contagious?".
Regards,
There is so little known about Morgellons
that I can't tell you any rules about it. I know that my kids and I
were exposed to the meteorite for over 30 years of my life and all of my
kids life, yet I have no evidence any of us picked up the "disease."
My son did die of an unexpected accidental death at the age of 19, but I
have no evidence that these filaments could be related.
I have seen these creatures move from object
to object under my microscope and I get the feeling that they do move
around, maybe by "jumping" or using air currents. It is certainly
possible that they do move from individual to individual, but I don't
think it is a major problem.
I didn't get your attachment so I can't
review the article.
I have a shaman friend who says that the
fibers are attracted to vinegar and that they can be removed by putting
bowls of vinegar in the room. I have no way of knowing if this is true,
but the evidence is accumulating that Mars has been acidic and maybe
these are acid loving creatures.
I hope that you don't suffer from Morgellons
and that we can shortly get this out in the open and get help for all
those that do suffer.
Your friend,
micromike
Evidence Of "Flooding" At Mangala Valles Imaged By Mars Express
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/marsexpress-04n.html
Spirit sniffs out salt on Red Planet
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/
RTGAM.20040608.wmarz0608/BNStory/specialScienceandHealth/
UFO Object—Is it Real?
http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=3864
I've met Bob White and I've held his "find" in my hands. I believe
he was given this object as a gift because he walked toward the craft
rather than running away. Sooner or later, mankind must learn to
deal with the life that exists outside our planet. I believe Bob and
his story.
6/9/4 Travel To Mars Could Be Harmful
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-base-04j.html
Travel anywhere can be harmful, but I've seen enough of Earth and would
gladly volunteer to go to Mars. And I'll even offer to stay there!
Fleshing Out Martian Proteins
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-life-04i.html
Imagine having a living example of life of another world, right here on
Earth, ready for study.
Secrets to life on Mars, predicting volcano eruption may be locked
in tiny bubbles
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14370
I'll e-mail these people and ask them to test the Frass.
6/8/4 The Geology Of Mars Mid-'04
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzx.html
This raises another important
question. Dark basalt sand is very rare on Earth, because most of the
minerals making up basalt rock slowly break down after just a few hundred
thousand years of exposure to liquid water - and the smaller the remaining
bit of basalt, the faster it is completely eaten away. (Thus most sand on
Earth is made of quartz, left over from weathered granite and stubbornly
resistant to water weathering.)
One of the predictions I
made was that the rovers would find basalt sand, just like in the Frass
Meteorite. Since, according to this quote, there is very little
basalt sand on Earth, the basalt sand in the Frass would be further
evidence of its Martian origin. Also, apparently only one place on
Earth has magnetic dust, but all of Mars does, as does the Frass.
Surveyor Clocks Up 25,000 Global Circuits Of Mars
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-surveyor-04a.html
On The Road Mars Style
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzv.html
6/7/4 The Case For Fossils On Mars
http://www.xenotechresearch.com/marsindx.htm
This guy was on Coast to Coast. He's got pictures of fossils and
they let him on. I've got the fossils and I don't get to say a word.
What is going on? However, this guy's site is very good and
there are lots of pages to look at. Spend some time and see the
evidence for Mars Life.
Chasing Martian Dust Devils
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-dust-04b.html
6/6/4 Why the Frass is not like a typical meteorite.
Anonymous letter to reader:
I would agree with you if the Frass were a
typical meteorite. However, my problem with the meteoritic community
from the beginning has been about a new class of meteorites
philosophically known to exist, but unrecognized until now: newly
formed meteorites from planetary bodies.
The reason K-Ar dating works on the Frass is
because it was, in essence, the last rock made on Mars. Most of the
"known" Martian meteorites are 100 to 200 million years old. That is
why I used K-Ar to start with. But the Frass was apparently made by two
side venting lava flows that occurred over a period of 36 million years,
starting 50 million years ago. I believe the ages are correct since I
had a good control in the experiment. I believe as volcanic systems
die, they move their venting from the main caldera to the sides. The
long stable volcanoes of Mars have followed this pattern and we see
where recent lava flows on Mars have occurred from side venting
positions. Part of my evidence for Martian origin is the chemistry that
I do have. It shows that the oldest material has been worked the least
(the silicon content is low relative to that which has been worked
longer), indicating it was laid down as an ancient lava flow, and then
only recently was remelted briefly, setting the K-Ar clock, but altering
the chemistry very little.
The point of all of this is that a newly
formed meteorite from a planetary body is going to be very different
from a typical meteorite that is probably made from the dead "bodies" of
planets and suns that have gone before. These are generally dense
objects and when they come apart, they tend to leave dense "chunks"
floating around. These are the typical meteorites and there is a set of
rules that applies to these meteorites. But the planetary body
meteorites can have any kind of characteristic that might exist on the
parent body. Thus my meteorite is basalt lava filled with the sand that
was present when the lava flowed. The rock is very light weight (only
22 pounds) having been made on Mars, a planet with a lower gravity than
Earth. Also, the "frothy" nature of the rock allowed it to come through
the Earth's atmosphere much like a space shuttle heat tile, so the
fusion crust is different than "normal." On the Frass, whatever is on
the outside edges is melted, whether it be sand or rock. But as one
gets deeper into the rock, the only melting that shows is when the lava
was hot and flowing, sticking sand and stuff to it as it flowed and
cooled. This difference in fusion crust has been one of the reasons
listed that the Frass can't be a meteorite. But when a rock falls from
the sky and shows the evidence of a hot passage, it is a meteorite,
whether it fits the "known" rules for meteorites or not.
My problem was that I told the scientists
from the beginning that they had designed the rules incorrectly for
finding newly formed meteorites (one of the scientists even wrote a
paper on how easily these types of meteorites would be confused as
terrestrial material, since lava from Mars looks a lot like lava from
Earth) from planetary bodies and I guess it pissed them off.
Any way, the standard tests for meteorites
are not appropriate for the Frass. The measurements now being taken on
Mars should be the comparison measurements, especially the magnetic
dust, which is probably the same over the entire planet of Mars.
Therefore, the magnetic dust in the Frass might be the best and easiest
way to identify the rock as coming from Mars.
If you can help me in any way to get
additional tests, I would be grateful for any tests that can be run,
whether appropriate or not. To this date, I'm the only one that has
ever run any scientific tests on the Frass. I hope this answers your
questions. Thanks for caring.
Your friend,
micromike
School kids to undertake the Mars project
http://newsfromrussia.com/science/2004/06/05/54300.html
6/5/4 Rovers Examining Hills And Crater In Bonus-Time
Mission
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040602a.html
This is a NASA press release. Move down to the fifth picture on the
left. Why is there an astronaut standing on Mars?
Compare
Opportunity to the Frass
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040602a.html
http://www.marslife.com/images/20030420_101252.jpg
NASA Mars Rover Opportunity Gets Green Light to Enter
Endurance Crater
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14353
Ancient life
on cold-water corals
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3773919.stm
It's a good thing life doesn't have to follow the limitations imposed by
humans.
6/4/4 Tiny fossils reveal key step in animal evolution
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995070
NASA Mars Rovers Examining Hills And Crater In Bonus-Time Mission
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14330
Mars Rovers Facing Crossroads
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzs.html
6/3/4 Comparison of Frass2 sample and the Mazatzal rock on
Mars
comparefrass2
I spent the day yesterday looking at the Frass2 samples and one sample
from the original Frass with my stereo zoom microscope. One of the
things I did differently yesterday, was that I looked at my fingers before
and after handling the meteorite samples. The samples are covered
with glassies and I discovered yesterday that I could not touch the
meteorite samples without getting glassies on my fingers. I don't
know if static electricity was at work, but I watched these things
"jump": from the meteorite to my finger, and from one finger to another
when I got them close to each other. I don't believe there is any
way that anyone can handle these samples without getting part of it on
you. Also, after I handle the pieces, my hands are always covered
with a very fine powder that feels finer than talc. I now know that
over time, I have breathed, drank, ate, and otherwise ingested parts of
Mars as I have handled this material over a matter of decades. And
there's nothing wrong with me, me, me ... :-)
New Bug Found in Frass
Meteorite
newbug
Spirit Pushes Onward Toward Hills, Opportunity Retraces its Steps
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/rovers_update_050602.html
6/2/4 More Mars Pictures
allesio
Allesio is comparing some of my microscopic pictures to those taken on
Mars. I think this is a valid exercise. When I took the first
core sample of the Frass meteorite, I recovered a great deal of sandy
material that was encased by the vesicles of the meteorite. I have
enough sand to cover the bottom of 15 to 20 Petri dishes. It
occurred to me early on, that this was actually the surface of Mars that I
was looking at. So I have taken these photos of the Frass Meteorite
sand with the expectation that they would look similar to the surface sand
of Mars. One of the findings of the rovers has been the basalt sand,
which I predicted before the rovers left Earth. All of this is
represented by Allesio's pictures.
Bringing The Martian Landscape To
The Silver Screen
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-general-04o.html
6/1/4 Beagle 2 Report: What happens on Mars, stays on Mars
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=954
Lab-on-a-chip
technology to help protect future space explorers and detect life forms on
Mars
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14312
5/30/4 Dark Energy Tied to Human Origins
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mystery_monday_040531.html
The article states that scientists have "known" the universe was
expanding, when in reality, they have only assumed. See SPOC2 below
for a complete explanation.
Opportunity On The Edge Of More Mars
Science
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzp.html
The Columbia Hills in Color
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzq.html
Well, almost in color.
5/29/4 SPOC Update
spoc2
There has been a lot of interest in the document lately, so I've updated
it.
Mars rover endures 'deep sleep' with no harm
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/05/29/mars.rover.ap/index.html
'Youngest planet' flouts theory of formation
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995052
5/28/4 Microscopic Imager :: Sol 140 (21 images)
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_m140.html
New Pictures from Spirit. Try to find one in focus.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/
141/2M138892286EFF54CAP2956M2M1.JPG
Here is one picture that is almost in focus. There appears to be
several glassies and other structures in this photo. Maybe this is
why the Spirit microscopic camera is never able focus.
Raw
Ingredients For Life Detected In Planetary Construction Zones
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/extrasolar-04o.html
In an infinite cosmos, life is everywhere. And comets come from
exploded planets that had oceans.
5/27/4 Glassy Discussion
Hey Mike, a question on your glassies and
reproduction? If glassies are truly alive, then they have to reproduce! In
pics that I have seen, they look like they are either budding, or
protruding from the ends of long stalks? Perhaps fission is involved or
something! What I have not seen though, any pics that might indicate baby
glassies? Have you seen any? They all appear to be around the same size,
with no apparent newly born! What are your ideas on that? Perhaps spores
are involved, who knows! You said that you thought they are indicative of
animal life, which would certainly eliminate glassies as being plant life!
Maybe they are what can be called plantimals, half of each, like some
microscopic life here on Earth. Maybe they are of both sexes, like
hermaphrodites, one individual having both characteristics! What have you
noticed concerning these ideas?
thanks Dennis
I believe they probably reproduce by budding, but could have other
mechanisms. As you note, one often sees smaller buds coming from the
main part. But what you can't see in the pictures is the great
number of glassies that exist of many sizes. I (and the rovers) can
only photograph the larger ones. Examinations with more powerful
microscopes have apparently seen more and more budding with smaller units
"hanging off" larger units. My assumption has been at some point the
smaller ones release and become independent. Also, I've recently
been reviewing the Frass2 meteorite which came from a farm in North
America. I haven't actually looked at the Frass in several years
now, as it is kept in a safety deposit box. The thing that has
amazed me is how fast these things get on everything. They seem to
shed from the rocks, but there never seems to be any less on the rocks.
My guess is that there is enough moisture in our Earth air to support them
and they are reproducing here faster than on the surface of Mars.
Also, they may not be plant or animal and may not fit into any category we
have defined based on only Earth animals. Look at the following
picture
for differences n size.
Mars Rover to Begin 'Deep Sleep' Modes
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/rover_sleep_040527.html
Apparently the scientists are in a deep sleep also.
Shields Up! New Radiation Protection for Spacecraft and Astronauts
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology
/technology/rad_shield_040527.html
Some Philosophical Observations on Cosmology
(SPOC)
This is something I wrote many years ago, but has had a surge of interest
in the last few days, for some reason.
5/26/4 New Images from Spirit
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_m135.html
There hasn't been an image for days from Spirit and now this. How
can anyone praise the scientists working this machine? And I still
don't understand why they didn't send a color microscopic camera.
All
Dressed Up And Ready To Explore
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-base-04i.html
But did they take glassies into account?
Survival of the Smallest: Mini-Microbes Redefine Extreme Living
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/microbe_limits_040526.html
5/25/4 Meteoritic versus Cosmology
Hey Mike, Dennis again! I heard several years ago,
that the density of our Universe allows it to fall into the category of a
Black Hole itself! Nothing can escape from a black hole, and likewise,
none of us can ever escape from our own Universe! I guess when all matter
in the Cosmos comes to an end, we too must go that way! Kind of depressing
isn't it? Of course that wont happen until many billions of years into the
future have passed! Actually there are people trying to figure a way
around the escape problem! Good luck to those future generations, if our
species can make it that far, and I have my doubts!
take care!
Normally, this letter would belong in Cosmologies.com. But there is
a tie in to the life of Mars. One of the reasons that the meteoritic
community hates me so, is that I've challenged their rules for finding
newly formed meteorites from planetary bodies. But I've also
challenged the entire cosmology community about the impossibility of their
single big bang model. I've proposed that black holes can only grow
so large before they come apart as a big bang event (BBE). This is a
normal process and is the cosmos's largest cycle. So even though we
are destined to become part of a black hole at some point in the future,
we are also destined to be a part of the rebirth that will occur when the
black hole explodes and redistributes its mass to be used by future stars
and galaxies. I believe the cosmos is infinite in space and time. See
David Black letter for more information.
More Mars Images
allesio
This is another letter sent from a reader and is very interesting.
At the bottom of this page is a link to his website where you will find
everything in Italian, but some great pictures. He has obviously
done a lot of work.
SETI Letter
seti
The search for extraterrestrial intelligence might begin here on Earth.
First we should search for any intelligent life on Earth. If the
speed of gravity is faster than the speed of light, why would any advanced
civilization use the speed of light to communicate? I've asked this
question of SETI but they have never answered me.
5/24/4 Cosmologies.com update
www.cosmologies.com
From time to time, I will post interesting articles that are appearing on
this sister site.
5/23/4 Beagle 2 was 'too great a risk'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3735663.stm
'Columbia
Hills' from Orbit
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040521a.html
5/22/4 MOLLIE Comments
mollie
Just a comment on the levitation and magnetic
drive for space craft! Since I am a sailor, or at least try to be, I
visit sites pertaining to that endeavor! One person there mentioned how
we should go to Mars, so I wrote back, " How else, we can SAIL THERE
USING THE SOLAR WINDS!" A large orbit between Earth and Mars, with
perhaps two or three permanent solar sail equiped space craft in
constant orbital motion, could use the solar wind to their advantage and
keep the process going! As one of these craft neared Earth, Astronauts,
would launch from Earth surface, and dock with one of these permanent
craft, and head out to Mars. The return flight would be the same, with
the men and women launching from Mars to catch the solar craft on its
solar powered return trajectory bound for Earth!
So lets GO!
Dennis
5/21/4 Magnetic Orbital Launch by Levitation and Integrated
Electronics
mollie
If we are ever going to make it to Mars, then I think this will be
necessary
.
Hello Mike! The subject of little green men,
brought to mind a book I read as a kid, called The Angry Red Planet! It
was about an expedition to Mars, where the plant life there, walked
around and had language, etc. etc. all the attributes of animals in many
ways! It was a cool story. Anyway as to whether alien plant life could
evolve into mobile units, well we dont know what nature can ultimately
achieve! I see no reason that if conditions are right, plants might
evolve a more efficient method for energy conversion from the star their
respective planet orbits! Then mobility would be feasible! Look at
carnivorous plants here on Earth! While they are not mobile, they
certainly have evolved new methods for gaining the energies necessary to
carry out life's functions! Perhaps on some distant world, the plants
have become predatory and actually hunt for their food too!
Just a thought process in motion!
Thanks Dennis
There is some evidence that the glassies might actually be an animal.
That would be strange. Also, since I've found so many insect parts
in the Frass, I've often wondered what ate the insects. Then one day
it occurred to me, the glassies. When you touch them, they are
sticky. I often find them in clumps and often they are near plant or
insect parts. So maybe they acted as a live "spider" web.
These creatures would attach to the rock and hang around waiting for a bug
to come along. If one does, he gets caught by the glassies and they
eat him. If they don't find something to their liking, maybe they
turn lose from the rock and fly in the wind, finding a new location with
new opportunities..
5/20/4 The Case Against Little Green Men
http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_green_040520.html
All I know is that there are green glassies in the Frass Meteorite.
Thus, the idea of green Martians is not too far off. :-)
5/19/4 Asteroid Eaters: Robots to Hunt Space Rocks, Protect
Earth
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology
/madmen_techwed_040519.html
This is just plain stupid. When one has lemons, make lemonade.
Asteroids are full of valuable resources. Why blow them up when we
need to use this material and stop raping mother Earth. See
Asteroid
Capture Project.
NASA Lab
Processes, Stores Meteorites
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/meteorites_jsc_040519.html
Why won't they process the Frass Meteorite. They say that meteorites
that land in America are subject to rain and other weather. Yet I
found the Frass Meteorite within 24 hours of its fall and it has never
been wet, since I've had it. In the article, they state that
meteorites are parts of old planets that have exploded. But the
Frass Meteorite represents a newly formed meteorite from a planetary body.
That makes it much different than an old meteorite that has come from an
exploding sun or planet.
5/18/4 New Mars rock hints at short-lived lakes
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99995004
One of the predictions I made before the rovers
left the Earth was that the rovers would find volcanic (basaltic) sand.
This is exactly what this report shows. They claim the basalt would
be quickly broken down in the presence of water, yet the Frass Meteorite
is only 13 million years old, meaning it was one of the last rocks made on
Mars. It clearly shows basaltic particles in the
sand preserved within its inner vesicles.
I have proposed that Mars has cycled back and forth through wet and dry
times, maybe at the global scale, but also at local scales as volcanic
systems cycle. The magnetic dust
particles on Mars are also basalt, but I'm not sure if NASA knows this
yet. So, another prediction is found to be correct, based solely on
the evidence contained within the Frass Meteorite.
NASA's Mars
Exploration Rover Opportunity Inspects Stone Ejected From Crater
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14241
5/17/4 Is NASA Holding Back Science?
I truly hope that a picture will come back from
one of the rovers,that NASA will not be able to deny is a fossil! The
trouble is they see all the returns first and can alter them according
to their wishes! It is always government rule, standing in our way and
keeping us from the truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dennis
I think a number of pictures have already come back showing
fossil remains and even the actual bodies of
creatures now living on Mars. (Compare
Glassies) But as Dennis properly recognizes, we are at the
mercy of NASA as to any "truths" that we might learn through their
research. (When I refer to NASA, I am pretty much referring to not
only the employees of NASA, but everyone that works with them in some
capacity on any of the space projects.) There is no doubt that
numerous features have made known their presence in many of the
microphotographs from Mars. There is also no doubt that NASA has
made no attempt to reexamine any of these anomalies and that misconduct
represents bad science at its best (or worst as the case may be)..
Thanks for the Complements
I agree with you 100%! I have now been looking at
your site everyday and
checking for all the updates you put on it. I have always been interested
in Ufology, Astrophysics, etc. (even though I have a Degree in History of
all things) and its great to see a site such as yours that is well
documented and done with class. I know how hard it is to try and get
stubborn minds to believe in something greater than themselves, and your
site is evidence of just that! Many people are just not willing to take a
look at evidence such as yours and countless others, thereby simply
dismissing it as unscientific and unfounded, which is very sad indeed.
Here
you have a plethora of plant and animal life growing inside a meteorite
from
Mars that has never been seen by human eyes, and the scientific community
will not take it into account. To that I say keep up the good work, and
maybe one day when they find evidence themselves (which I still have
feelings they may already have) they will see the truth!
I will definitely stay in contact, and take care!
Shawn
The Lion's Share Of Mars
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzl.html
Look at the "true color" photograph in this article and then look at the
version that NASA has released. If this is true color, then they
must have taken it at night. I can't believe they would charge us
$800 million for photos like this.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040512a.html
5/16/4 Interplanetary “Day After Tomorrow?”
http://www.enterprisemission.com/_articles/05-14-2004/Interplanetary_1.htm
On to Mars - Remarks to National Keep It Sold Reception by House
Majority Leader Tom DeLay
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=12862
Maybe we should just turn over the NASA budget to Burt Ratan. Look
what he can do with just a few million dollars.
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/xprize-04d.html
5/15/4 Frass2 Makes Its Appearance
frass2
Who is Responsible for the Abuse in
Iraq?
abuse
I don't usually make political statements, as this web site is about the
study of life on Mars. But if we don't change course quickly, there
may not be any life on Earth left to study the life of Mars.
5/14/4 Who Contaminated Who?
Hey Mike, Dennis again! There was an article out
not to long ago, about how our most recent space probes to Mars have not
been sterilized like in the old days! This means, quite probably, we
are seeding the sands of Mars with our own forms of life! It was also
noted some time ago, that in the early space program days, while the
United States was sterilizing their vehicles, the Soviets may not have
been. Perhaps Mars sent us her packages long ago, and we in turn are
sending her ours now! Just a thought! If our types can get down and
dirty on Mars, within the salty-brine, perhaps they can survive!
Dennis
To the best of my knowledge, NASA did try to sterilize both rovers
before they left Earth. However, there is no way to guarantee that
the process is complete and any microorganisms left viable means it is not
sterilized. If I remember right, we have evidence from the manned
moon trips, that bacteria survived the transit both ways through space,
even though they weren't supposed to make the trip. Additionally, it
is now evident that Mars sends a lot of material to Earth and the evidence
from the Frass and now a second meteorite, show that life can make the
transit. In my opinion, it is much harder to get material from Earth
to Mars, but in an infinite cosmos, one would expect this to happen to
some degree. I think life is probably everywhere and some Earth
organisms will quickly adapt to Martian conditions by sharing genes (if
that is possible) and acquiring the characteristics that are necessary to
live on Mars. Thanks again for another interesting letter.
Starstrikes: Calling Cards From The Cosmos
http://www.rense.com/general52/calling.htm
Why not try
Asteroid
Capture Project
?
5/13/4 Latest Picture from Mars
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/106/
1M137593980EFF2208P2956M2M1.JPG
See if you can find a glassy in this picture.
Bringing Mars Back Home
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-life-04h.html
The Frass Meteorite (and now a second meteorite) have brought a sample of
Mars and its life to Earth. Why don't we consider taking a piece of
the Frass Meteorite back to Mars?
5/12/4 Morgellons Update
morgellons
The "hate mail" posted below on 5/10/4 was in response to the Morgellons
problem. Most of the doctors that first examine these people think
they are crazy and are seeing things. The debate is whether this
assumption is true or not. Obviously, I'm not imagining the things
I'm photographing in the Frass Meteorite. Here is a quote from the
Morgellons post:
"I was very wary of the Morgellons Disease story
because physicians assured me these folks were delusional and said it's
counter-productive, even dangerous, to reinforce their delusions. I
didn't want to do harm, and the Morgellons patients are already suffering
so much. But, I met and talked to patient after patient with the same
verifiable symptoms. And I interviewed doctor after doctor, all of whom
had the same pat answers about patients (and evidence) they had not seen.
After two months, too many things didn't add up - and that always means
the story is worth printing." -- Frank Mullen, Jr., Investigative
Reporter
More MarsLife Comments
Hello, I was just browsing the internet and came upon your site of the
Frass
Meteorite. Thank you very much for all the great information on the site
as
I have been looking for a site such as yours for years now. I believe
wholeheartedly that there is life out there since I was a small child, and
after my "close encounter" back in Dec. 2003 when a triangular object the
size of 2 football fields flew directly 100 feet over me and then took off
and flew what had to be the distance of 3 miles in just 3-4 seconds (I
could
clearly see almost every nook and cranny of the object).
Anyhow, sorry for ranting as I could tell every detail of that
experience.
I just want to say your site is a breath of fresh air with very compelling
evidence. I applaud you for a job well done, and I hope that the
scientific
community will one day will take evidence like yours more seriously.
PS- The pictures you provide of the small creatures in the Meteor nearly
made my jaw drop to the floor. I cant believe I may actually be looking
at
a Martian lifeform.....WOW!
Spirit Takes the Helm
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040510a.html
Spirit still can't focus it's microscopic camera - latest pictures
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040510a.html
Deep Sleep Will Give Opportunity Endurance To Cruise Round Crater
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzk.html
5/11/4 Not All Believe in the Life of Mars (update)
Hey Mike, It is to bad this guy keeps bad
mouthing you! You are only stating your theories, and everyone has that
right! Free speech etc. Even myself, I have my own ideas, and I agree
with some of what you say, some of what even Hoagland says, but not all!
Even a little with what the President says, but not as much! I do think
NASA should investigate whatever is on Mars, and while I think, there is a
good chance of life underground, I still have a problem with the surface
idea, and I may be proven wrong, and so be it!! It will be a great day
when these questions and all can finally be answered, to all our
satisfaction! I do think too, that whomever addresses your site, should
do so without profanity, etc. it is so uncool!
Dennis Keep the faith1 I hope Spirit makes the hills!
Thanks for the kind words. The gentleman below has a friend who has
Morgellons. He thinks the disease is physiological and that the
filaments are from the imagination and are not real. But since I can
photograph the filaments from the Frass Meteorite, I would make the claim
that they are real. This site is dedicated to an open mind. As
a philosopher, I must keep my mind open or I stop growing. The
evidence of Martian life as presented by the Frass Meteorite is now
overwhelming, even though the meteoritic community has been underwhelmed
by this prospect. I present this evidence to the world community as
I search for truth. This site offers a forum for those that want to
talk about the life of other worlds, in particular, the life of Mars.
I never ask anyone to believe anything that I say, only that they think
about it and make up their own minds. I believe that society is best
served by as many individuals as possible expressing as diverse a
set of beliefs as possible. I'm not certain that Morgellons fibers
and the Frass fibers are the same, although the evidence is mounting. My
promise to all my readers is that I will never deliberately mislead you
and that I will always provide all the evidence for Mars life (pro or con)
of which I am aware.
Deep Faults And Disrupted
Crater At Acheron Fossae
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/marsexpress-04l.html
5/10/4 Not All Believe in the Life of Mars
Micro mike,
Since my last addition to your ridiculous website my friend has gotten
considerably worse. I'd like to thank you for spreading your delusional
crap out onto the internet to people who truly need help and aid in
supporting their issues. I've taken the time to read some of the
letters
you've written to Doug and Brendan, whoever they are,
(Doug Stephan Radio Show) and it confirms to
me that you need serious help. I'm certain that members of your family
have told you this as well. Please Mike, go talk to a psychiatrist who can
help you sort out the issues you are dealing with so you can stop
contributing to the delusional shit you are spreading. You are honestly
hurting people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This guy must be a Republican, because he never discusses the issues and
only attacks the character of those with which he disagrees. There are at
least 100 photos from Mars that now show these creatures. Here is
the latest picture from Opportunity.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/100/
1M137060905EFF2002P2956M2M1.JPG Look
midway down the left side and see a white filament laying over a small
rock. I'm now in possession of a second meteorite that clearly has
glassies within it. While I was examining one of the pieces, I
noticed that a white glassy had stuck to my finger. I rubbed it back
on the meteorite, but it clearly showed the behavior of attaching to me.
If I had an open wound at the point it attached, I think there is a good
chance it would have entered. Without the microscope, I would have
no way of knowing what was happening. It seems to me that finding a
solution to this problem would be the best way to help the people
suffering from Morgellons. If the glassies come from Mars, and I
think the evidence is now very strong, then they have been without liquid
water for some time. Searching for water doesn't seem insane to me,
but then again, I never claimed to be normal. Am I also crazy to
suggest that the cosmos is infinite and that we are not at the center?
Spirit's Express Route to 'Columbia Hills'
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040506a.html
5/9/4 New Mars Meteorite Found - Almost Identical to
Frass - Contains Glassies!
Stay tuned. Pictures and story to follow.
5/8/4 Life In The Universe Could Be Just About Everywhere
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-04zw.html
It is.
Mars Rovers in Autumn: A Life-and-Death Drama on the Red
Planet
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/rovers_autumn_040506.html
Parasitic invasion credited with evolution of sex
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994960
New crater rocks tempting for Mars rover
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994970
Were the spheres eroded out of rock, or did they grow there?
5/7/4 More evidence of Glassies on Mars
hamdi
Very interesting reading.
Scientists Confront 'Weird Life' on Other
Worlds
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astrobiology_nrc_040507.html
If they want to learn about weird life, they should study the Frass
Meteorite
Planning for Mars, The Stafford Way
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/spacetravel-04w.html
The Spirit Of A Country Mile On Mars
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzj.html
NASA Mars Rover Arrival at Deeper Crater Provides a Tempting Eyeful
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14175
Mars rover to explore crater secrets
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/05/06/rover.crater/index.html
5/5/4 More pictures from Mars
noel
The second picture shows a rock that is very similar to what the Frass
Meteorite must have looked like before it left Mars. Notice numerous
vesicles, very sharp edges as if this rock is very new, and it is sitting
right on the surface. This appears to have been the same history for
the Frass Meteorite, as it shows 50 million years of sitting on the
surface of a planet.
Study May Cast Doubt on Some 1996 NASA Evidence
of Past Life on Mars
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14162
If they would spend ten minutes studying the Frass Meteorite, then all of
these questions could be answered. Why won't they even look at the
life of Mars when it sits right in front of them?
Spirit Encounters New Communication Problem
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzh.html
5/4/4 Enhanced Pictures of Filaments Structures on Mars
(updated 5/5/4)
hamdi
An interested reader of MarsLife has undertaken the project of finding
the highest resolution pictures available from the rover's microscopic
cameras and then enhancing these pictures so that we might get more
detail. The first posting is today and hopefully many more will
follow. We are having trouble finding tif files from the rover, so
if anyone knows where to find these files, please let us know.
Endurance Rocks With Opportunities
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzg.html
NASA Releases New View of Mars 'Endurance Crater'
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/opportunity_endurance_040504.html
5/3/4 City-Sized Asteroid to Pass Earth This Fall
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mystery_monday_040503.html
Why not try the
Asteroid
Capture Project?
Molecular rings could shelter Venus bugs
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994936
Life is probably everywhere in an infinite cosmos.
5/2/4 Why NASA scientists are concerned from these traces
http://www.escribe.com/science/vortex/m30564.html
Mars rocket
designs favor tried and true
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/04/30/space.rockets.reut/index.html
4/30/4 Mars Express Radar Deployment Postponed
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/marsexpress-04k.html
Opinions on
Mars life
viewtopic.php-p=26010&sid=d31650087a117697e7e254794d5289f4
4/29/4 Glassies on Mountains?
Question: If Spirit makes it to the Columbia mts., and takes soil
samples, do you think there will still be glassies at the higher levels?
In other words, out of the sea basins?
thanks for your time
Dennis
Dear Dennis,
I think the glassies have covered the
surface of Mars. It took me a long time to come to that conclusion, but
here is my logic. The glassies are very light weight and when I view
them under the microscope, usually I can't breath while I am looking at
them. Just a gentle breath will propel them out of the Petri dish and
into the air. Also, while I was showing the meteorite at the Roswell
UFO Museum, one day I was showing a particularly large blue glassy.
Everyday I would show a different vesicle and its contents, so that
everyday I had a different view for the public. On this particular day,
the big blue glassy was laying atop a vesicle, for about half of the
day. Then it was gone completely and I couldn't find it. I showed the
meteorite in a sealed Plexiglas case that kept all air currents away and
I could conceive of no way for it to move, unless it had "sprung" itself
into the air. That started me thinking that maybe this was the way they
traveled on Mars, but "jumping" up into the air and being flown away.
There is evidence from the Morgellons people that glassies do indeed
have this behavior. On Mars, the dust storms can be as large as the
planet and thus the surface dust on Mars is probably global, meaning the
same dust is covering the entire planet. If these creatures ride in the
wind, then these large dust storms would give them the ability to move
planet wide. So I think we will find glassies everywhere that the
microscopic cameras are used, if they ever learn to focus the Spirit
camera.
Your friend,
micromike
Rocks in Sand
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/089/
1M136083593EFF1500P2906M2M1.JPG
One of the features of the Frass Meteorite is the existence of little
rocks in a sandy material encased in most of the larger vesicles.
Although the first rock photographed by Pathfinder was very similar to the
Frass Meteorite, nothing so far returned from the two rovers has appeared
similar, until now. This picture apparently shows small rocks (and
possibly other things) sitting in a bed of sand. This is the exact
situation I've seen in the Frass Meteorite.
Evidence of Ancient Blisters in Rocks
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040428a.html
This is another feature of the Frass Meteorite. It has literally a
million vesicles in a basketball size meteorite. Scroll down to find
this article and note that they are finding many of these rocks now with
the Spirit rover. The glassies seem to like the vesicles as a home,
so I hope they stop and photograph some of these rocks and their vesicles.
But knowing NASA, I have little hope.
Press Release Images:
Opportunity
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040428a.html
There are several interesting articles and pictures here.
Spirit Sets Personal
Best, Opportunity Nears Next Mars Stop
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/rover_updates_040428.html
4/28/4 Plausibility of Martian Microbes
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-life-04f.html
Mars microbes available for study in the Frass Meteorite. Are
there any "real" scientists out there that want to see the life of Mars?
Spirit's Travels
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040427a.html
Opportunity's Travels
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040427a.html
4/27/4 Martian Water Science Early 2004
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-water-science-04d-printready.html
This is a very good article and confirms many things that I have been
saying for years. For most of the articles that I post on this site,
I only speed read through them because there is usually only one or two
small pieces of new information. However, this article puts together
a large amount of research and requires "slow" reading.
Mars Science
Laboratory: New Rover, New Science Equipment
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/
marssciencelab_science_040427.html
I hope they can afford a color microscopic camera on this one. They
also might consider putting some mechanism for focusing the cameras, since
photos in focus would seem to be advantageous.
4/26/4 A Little Science, A Lot Of
Driving
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzzb.html
Boy, you can say that again. There have been almost no new
microscopic pictures for some time. However, some more pictures from
sol 105 have finally arrived from Spirit. Check out the next link
and see how many glassies you can find in this picture. Also, are
these clam shells in this photo?
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/m/105/
2M135687606EFF3000P2956M2M1.JPG and then these from Opportunity
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/
m/084/1M135640924EFF1300P2956M2M1.JPG
4/24/4 FOSSILIZED BACTERIA IN MURCHISON AND EFREMOVKA
http://www.panspermia.org/zhmur1.htm
I've always thought that asteroids are just the remains of suns and
planets that have gone before. Maybe planets do explode )Tom Van
Flandern) but we know that suns explode, which would include any nearby
planets. Thus, any meteorite that falls to Earth is going to be made
up of some of this stuff. Probably most nickel iron meteorites are
the remains of suns or the cores of planets, while carbonate meteorites
are mostly the crusts of planets. Comets would be their oceans.
If this is true, then finding the remains of life in meteorites would be
expected, although it would be hard to judge how often that should occur.
Search for Mars water goes underground
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994919
4/23/4 Thread-like Feature on Mars: Mystery Solved
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/spotlight/opportunity/
opp_200403a_Thread_on_Mars.html
The fault in their logic is that the filaments do appear in numerous
photographs from both rovers. See Compare
Glassies for a few of the
pictures. What I wonder is why NASA didn't come and look at the
filaments in the Frass Meteorite. If there are two models to explain
the filaments, shouldn't they examine both? Is it good science for
scientists to make up their minds before their experiments are even
conducted. It looks to me like this is just another cover-up of the
truth by the good folks at NASA. Also, Noel mentions in the next
article, that the filament travels under one of the rocks. If you
look through the photographs, you will see them in all situations.
I'll try to take some new pictures of my glassies sitting on Martian sand
in the next few days and post them on this site.
Noel Sends Us Images
from NASA
noel
Please note the filaments lying under the rocks in the first photo.
The Flanks of Olympus Mons
http://www.space.com/imageoftheday/image_of_day_040423.html
Mars Rover Science Featured At Astrobiology Conference
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-life-04d.html
Putting The Geology Back Into Martian Science
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-water-science-04c.html
Another attempt to paint a dry Mars, when the evidence from the Frass
Meteorite and all the Mars probes indicate that Mars has plenty of water
and it has been on the surface within the last 50 million years.
New Case for Oldest Life on Earth
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/lava_life_040422.html
Should We Make Mars Another Earth?
http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=3731
4/22/4 Keith Laney Home Page
http://www.keithlaney.com/
If you want to see what the true colors of Mars might look like, then
visit Keith's web site. Keith has processed images for NASA and
Richard Hoagland and I can find no fault in Keith's processing. This
is the quality we should get from NASA. Thank you Keith Laney for
being a good citizen and caring about the truth.
Mars mission far
from over
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4790474/
4/21/4 True Colors of Mars
http://home.comcast.net/~truecolorsofmars/
This article discusses not only the problem that NASA has in getting the
colors right on Mars, but also the reasons why they might try to hide the
fact that Mars has a blue sky and life. This has been the hardest
problem for me to understand. After the first few years of dealing
with the meteoritic community over the Frass Meteorite, I knew that
science was not the controlling factor. Some kind of politics was
involved and I guess I'm just too stupid to understand politics.
From my small viewpoint, it looks like mankind should work together to
solve the problems that face us and threaten our existence as a species.
We know that each of us as an individual will eventually leave this world,
so the question is can we save the species? I don't understand why
human beings constantly benefit their own narrow lives and apparently take
actions that threaten the existence of us all. As far as how humans
would react to the presence of life on Mars or intelligent life in the
cosmos, I think the problem has been blown way out of proportion. My
grandkids talk of aliens all the time and don't seem to be overly afraid
of them. After talking to over 20,000 people at the UFO Museum in
Roswell while showing the Frass Meteorite, I never met anyone that was
afraid of the life of Mars. Fundamental Christians challenged my age
dating at 13 and 49 million years, but accepted the life of Mars as part
of the miracle of God's creation. After all, I prayed to the same God
every night of my childhood that He would send me "a piece of space."
Most Christians are not fundamental and easily accept the concept that God
can create life through the process of evolution. Currently, the
single big bang model has mankind at the center of a finite cosmos created
out of nothing 13.5 billion years ago. The fundamental Christians
say that everything was created out of nothing 6,000 years ago and the
only difference I see between the two models is the number of zeros.
In an infinite cosmos, there is no center, so we can't be there. In
an infinite cosmos, life is everywhere. The scientists of today have taken
the place of the Catholic Church in holding back the truth and new ideas.
We are not alone in the cosmos and most people will adapt quickly to the
news of Mars life. Most people on planet Earth will cherish the life
of Mars, as they cherish the life of Earth, and I think they will want to
go to Mars and take a small piece of the Frass Meteorite back to its home,
and maybe the home of humanity.
NASA Research: Dust devils on Mars might have high-voltage electric
fields
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=14063
4/20/4 Methane on Mars: Or … “Back to the Future …?”
http://www.enterprisemission.com/_articles/04-13-2004/Methane_on_Mars.htm
There are three part to this article. Richard Hoagland makes some
interesting points and I very much appreciate his ability to see things
differently. I have several disagreements with his hyperdimensional
model of physics, and I don't know if Mars was orbiting another planet
that exploded. We do have evidence of a Martian pole shift, and the
evidence that one side of Mars is many kilometers higher than the other
side. I can't think of any other way to shift the pole of a planet,
but to hit it with something big. That could have been an exploding
planet, but there is evidence on Mars of 6 or 7 very large asteroid
impacts over time that could have disrupted the atmosphere and shifted the
poles. Hoagland's Tidal Model explains that there was a large number
of impacts (including much water) on once side of the planet and this is
why it is higher than the other side. Thus, at least some of the
water and most of the meteorite craters came from this one event. I
have proposed that Mars cycled through time. Asteroids have
struck the planet through time, but most of that time, Mars had an ocean
and atmosphere. That ocean tended to erase meteorite craters on that
side of the planet. The other side rose because of the continued volcanic
action on that side of the planet. The atmosphere on Mars came from
the volcanic systems, as on Earth. Large asteroid impacts over time
disrupted the atmosphere several times, but each time the volcanoes,
powered by the internal energy of the planet, brought back the atmosphere.
Life evolved early and "learned" to deal with large cycles, maybe measured
in millions of years. I don't know what part of my model is correct
and what part of Hoagland's model is correct. It could well be a
combination of both. Hoagland thinks the exploding planet occurred
65 million years ago and helped contribute to the extinction of the
dinosaurs by creating a large asteroid that later struck Earth. The
oldest date in the Frass Meteorite is 49 million years, so by Hoagland's
model, the Frass Meteorite was created after this cataclysmic event.
The Frass Meteorite clearly shows life and water and volcanic action
occurring within this last 50 million years, after Hoagland's event at 65
million years ago. I don't know what all this means.
Missoula Crater In Sight
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzy.html
4/19/4
FOSSILS ON MARS - What I Have Found
http://home.cfl.rr.com/aichip/marsfoss.htm
The Case For Fossils On Mars
http://www.xenotechresearch.com/marsindx.htm
The case for Mars fossils in the Frass Meteorite is further validated.
Why won't the people at Coast to Coast cover the Frass Meteorite.
They can interview someone who has looked at pictures of things on Mars,
but won't interview the person that has looked at the actual objects right
here on Earth. Also, notice the glassies in the pictures of sand
dollars, etc.
Opportunity Dashes 140 Meters
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/mars-mers-04zzzx.html
There are two pictures in this article. Notice the difference in
colors between the two.
4/18/4 Our Solar System Is No Accident
http://www.rense.com/general51/solar.htm
Here is an article I just don't understand. This person believes
that Mars has life, but also takes a literal interpretation of the Bible.
The article puts down evolution in favor of creationism, yet the proposed
creation by design could come from either God or alien, as I see things.
In addition, I have no trouble seeing things advancing on their own,
evolving in a natural fashion. I have written an
article on evolution
versus creationism, and I argue that if you believe in DNA, you believe in
the principles of evolution, although the mechanisms are still in debate..
Also, Tom Van Flandern has proposed a
model for the creation of our moon that doesn't involve "lucky"
impacts.
4/17/4 Author: Mars mission to inspire humanity
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/04/16/
| 
News & Comments on
the life of Mars...updated
6/29/4
